E.g. “Yamaha Kodiak”, “Can-Am Outlander”, “Kawasaki Brute Force”
3 of 3 selected:
Arctic Cat 400 4X4×
Dinli Helix 150×
Arctic Cat 400 4X4×
Key Specs at a Glance
Engine
371cc / Unknown
149 cc / Unknown
371cc / 22.64
Full Specifications
| × Remove | × Remove | × Remove |
|---|
| Engine Spec |
|---|
| Engine Detail | 371cc, liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, 4-valve, overhead cam with automatic compression release | 4-stroke single, SOHC | 371cc, Liquid-cooled with fan, 4-stroke, 4-valve SOHC |
|---|
| Valve Configuration | – | – | 4-valve ✓ |
|---|
| Seats |
|---|
| Seat Height (mm / in.) | – | 701 / 27.6 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Transmission (Gearbox) and Final Drive |
|---|
| Final Drive | – | Chain 428 O-ring ✓ | – |
|---|
| Transmission | – | Automatic (CVT-belt) with reverse | – |
|---|
| Engine Spec |
|---|
| Ignition | – | Electric / kick | – |
|---|
| Bore Stroke(mm) | – | 57.4 mm x 57.8 mm | – |
|---|
| Towing |
|---|
| Towing Capacity (Kg / Lbs.) | 476 / 1050 | – | 476 / 1050 |
|---|
| Racks and Payload |
|---|
| Rack Capacity Rear (Kg / Lbs.) | 91 / 200 | – | 91 / 200 |
|---|
| Rack Capacity Front (Kg / Lbs.) | 45 / 100 | Unknown / 225 ✓ | 45 / 100 |
|---|
| Fuel |
|---|
| Fuel Tank Capacity (l / gal.) | 16 / 4.25 | 5.68 / 1.5 | 18 / 4.75 ✓ |
|---|
| Tires and Rims |
|---|
| Tires Rear | 25 x 10-12, (4psi) | Maxxis 18 x 9.5-8 | 25 x 10-12 |
|---|
| Tires Front | 25 x 8-12, (4.5 psi) | Maxxis 19 x 7-8 | 25 x 8-12 |
|---|
| Dimensions and Weight |
|---|
| Dry Weight (Kg / Lbs.) | 265 / 585 | 125 / 275 ✓ | 295 / 651 |
|---|
| Wheelbase (mm / in.) | 1270 / 50.0 | 1001 / 39.4 ✓ | 1270 / 50 |
|---|
| Ground Clearance (mm / in.) | 234 / 9.2 | – | 273 / 10.75 ✓ |
|---|
| Height (mm / in.) | 1143 / 45.0 | 991 / 39.0 ✓ | 1219 / 48 |
|---|
| Width (mm / in.) | 1143 / 45.0 | 866 / 34.1 ✓ | 1143 / 45 |
|---|
| Length (mm / in.) | 2019 / 79.5 | 1461 / 57.5 ✓ | 2057 / 81 |
|---|
| Suspension |
|---|
| Suspension Rear | Semi-independent, 7.2" (18.3) of travel | Swing-arm with adjustable hydraulic shocks with 2 in. travel ✓ | ACT-independent w/7.2" of travel |
|---|
| Front Suspension | Independent double A-arm, 7.2" (18.3) of travel | Single A-arms with adjustable hydraulic shocks with 2 in. travel ✓ | Fully independent w/8.5" of travel |
|---|
| Brakes |
|---|
| Brakes Rear | Hydraulic disc, single-lever actuated | Hydraulic disc | Disc |
|---|
| Brakes Front | Hydraulic disc, single-lever actuated, with parking brake. Foot operated mechanical rear brake, | Drum | Disc |
|---|
| Engine Spec |
|---|
| Engine Cylinders | single-cylinder | single-cylinder | – |
|---|
| Engine Cooling | liquid-cooled | Air-cooled | Liquid-cooled with fan |
|---|
| Engine Type | 4-stroke | 4-stroke | 4-stroke |
|---|
| Engine Valves | 4-valve, overhead cam with automatic compression release ✓ | SOHC | SOHC |
|---|
| Engine Capacity (cc / Ci ) | 371cc / Unknown | 149 cc / Unknown | 371cc / 22.64 |
|---|
| Suspension |
|---|
| Suspension - Front Travel (mm / in.) | – | – | 216 / 8.5 ✓ |
|---|
| Rear Travel (mm / in.) | – | – | 183 / 7.2 ✓ |
|---|
Clear all & start over
Pros & Cons
✓ Pros
- Largest engine in this comparison (371cccc)
- Highest rated towing capacity (476kg)
- Independent front suspension for better ride comfort
- Independent rear suspension — improved handling on uneven ground
✗ Cons
- Heavier than the 2007 Dinli Helix 150
✓ Pros
- Lightest of the group — easier to manoeuvre
- Independent front suspension for better ride comfort
- CVT automatic transmission — easy to ride, no gear-changing
- Lower seat height — more accessible for shorter riders
✗ Cons
- Smaller engine than the 2000 Arctic Cat 400 4X4
- Drum brakes on front — less stopping power than disc
✓ Pros
- Solid towing capacity for farm use (476kg)
- Best ground clearance — handles rough terrain well
- Independent front suspension for better ride comfort
- Independent rear suspension — improved handling on uneven ground
✗ Cons
- Smaller engine than the 2000 Arctic Cat 400 4X4
- Heavier than the 2007 Dinli Helix 150
Comparing 2000 Arctic Cat 400 4X4 vs 2007 Dinli Helix 150 vs 2002 Arctic Cat 400 4X4 — Common Questions
Which has the most powerful engine?
The 2000 Arctic Cat 400 4X4 has the largest displacement at 371cccc, making it the most powerful in this comparison. A larger engine generally means more torque for towing and off-road work.
Which quad is the lightest?
The 2007 Dinli Helix 150 is the lightest at 125kg (dry weight). A lighter quad is easier to manoeuvre on trails and simpler to recover if stuck.
Which is best for farm work and towing?
For heavy farm use the 2000 Arctic Cat 400 4X4 has the highest towing capacity at 476kg. For general farm duties any quad with 4WD and a towing rating above 400kg is suitable for light implements, spray rigs and game-reserve work.
Which has the better suspension?
Independent front suspension (A-Arm or IFS) absorbs bumps better than solid-axle designs and improves handling on uneven terrain. Check the Suspension category in the full table above to compare front and rear travel for each model.
Which is the easiest to ride?
CVT automatic transmission is easiest for beginners — there is no gear-changing or clutch to manage. A lower seat height also makes a quad more accessible for shorter riders. Check the Transmission and Seat Height rows in the table above.
Advertisement