E.g. “Yamaha Kodiak”, “Can-Am Outlander”, “Kawasaki Brute Force”
2 of 3 selected:
Arctic Cat 90 DVX SE×
Dinli Diablo 150×
Key Specs at a Glance
Engine
90 / 5.49
149 cc / 9.09
Full Specifications
| × Remove | × Remove |
|---|
| Engine Spec |
|---|
| Engine Capacity (cc / Ci ) | 90 / 5.49 | 149 cc / 9.09 ✓ |
|---|
| Exterior - Safety and Design |
|---|
| CV Boot Cover | No | – |
|---|
| Brush Guard | No | – |
|---|
| Body Material | Plastic | – |
|---|
| Bash Plate (Rear) | No | – |
|---|
| Bash Plate (Front) | Yes | – |
|---|
| Lighting |
|---|
| Halogen Headlights | Standard | – |
|---|
| Headlights | Standard | – |
|---|
| Lighting | Halogen | – |
|---|
| Seats |
|---|
| Seat Adjustable | No | – |
|---|
| Exterior - Safety and Design |
|---|
| Decal Kit | Standard | – |
|---|
| Seats |
|---|
| Seat Type | One-Piece | – |
|---|
| Seat Location | Driver | – |
|---|
| Number Of Seats | 1 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Fuel |
|---|
| Fuel Tank Capacity (l / gal.) | 5.5 / 1.5 | 5.68 / 1.5 |
|---|
| Tires and Rims |
|---|
| Rear Solid Axle | Yes | – |
|---|
| Rim Material | Steel | – |
|---|
| Rear Rim Width (in) | 7 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Rear Rim Diameter (in) | 8 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Rear Tire Width (in) | 8 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Rear Tire Diameter (in) | 19 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Seats |
|---|
| Seat Material | Vinyl | – |
|---|
| Exterior - Safety and Design |
|---|
| Floor Board Location | Driver | – |
|---|
| Folding Foot Pegs | No | – |
|---|
| Frame | Steel | – |
|---|
| Tires and Rims |
|---|
| Tire Make | – | Maxxis |
|---|
| Engine Spec |
|---|
| Engine Detail | – | 4-stroke single, SOHC ✓ |
|---|
| Manufacturer and Warranty |
|---|
| Parent Company | Arctic Cat | – |
|---|
| Recommend Minimum Age | 10 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Manufacturer Country | USA | – |
|---|
| Steering |
|---|
| Turning Circle | 13 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | – |
|---|
| Exterior - Safety and Design |
|---|
| Shock Cover | No | – |
|---|
| Safety Flag | Standard | – |
|---|
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | No | – |
|---|
| Rear Fender | Standard | – |
|---|
| Rear Bumper | Standard | – |
|---|
| Radiator Guard | No | – |
|---|
| Light Guard | No | – |
|---|
| Handlebar Pads | Standard | – |
|---|
| Hand Guards | No | – |
|---|
| Hand Grips | Standard | – |
|---|
| Full Length Skid Plate | No | – |
|---|
| Front Stabilizer Bar | No | – |
|---|
| Front Fender | Standard | – |
|---|
| Front Bumper | Standard | – |
|---|
| Tires and Rims |
|---|
| Tires Rear | AT 19 X 8-8 ✓ | Maxxis 18 x 9.5-8 |
|---|
| Racks and Payload |
|---|
| Rack Capacity Front (Kg / Lbs.) | – | Unknown / 225 ✓ |
|---|
| Tires and Rims |
|---|
| Front Rim Width (in) | 6 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Front Tire Width (in) | 7 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Suspension |
|---|
| Front Adjustable Fork Pre-Load | Yes | – |
|---|
| Suspension - Front Travel (mm / in.) | 71 / 2.8 ✓ | 51 / 2 |
|---|
| A-Arm Skid Plate (Front) | No | – |
|---|
| Front Suspension | Independent A-Arm | Single A-arms with adjustable hydraulic shocks with 2 in. travel ✓ |
|---|
| Brakes |
|---|
| Brakes Rear | Hydraulic Disc | Hydraulic disc |
|---|
| Brakes Front | Drum | Drum |
|---|
| Engine Spec |
|---|
| Speed Governor | Yes | – |
|---|
| Ignition | Electric / Kick | Electric / kick |
|---|
| Fuel Type | Petrol | – |
|---|
| Suspension |
|---|
| Front Adjustable Rebound Damping | No | – |
|---|
| Engine Spec |
|---|
| Carborator Count | 1 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Bore Stroke(in) | 1.85in. x 2.04in. | – |
|---|
| Bore Stroke(mm) | 47mm x 51.8mm ✓ | 57.4 mm x 57.8 mm |
|---|
| Displacement To Weight CC | 0.35 | – |
|---|
| Engine Cylinders | Single-Cylinder | single-cylinder |
|---|
| Engine Cooling | Air | Air-cooled |
|---|
| Engine Type | 4-Stroke | 4-stroke |
|---|
| Total Valves | 2 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Valve Configuration | 2-valve ✓ | – |
|---|
| Engine Valves | SOHC | SOHC |
|---|
| Fuel System | Carburetor | – |
|---|
| Suspension |
|---|
| Suspension Rear | Swing Arm | Swing-arm with adjustable hydraulic shock with 2 in. travel ✓ |
|---|
| Suspension Rear - Material | Steel | – |
|---|
| A-Arm Skid Plate (Rear) | No | – |
|---|
| Tires and Rims |
|---|
| Front Tire Diameter (in) | 20 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Tires Front | AT 20 X 7-8 ✓ | Maxxis 19 x 7-8 |
|---|
| Transmission (Gearbox) and Final Drive |
|---|
| Reverse | Yes | Yes |
|---|
| Hi / Low Range | No | – |
|---|
| Primary Drive - Rear Wheels | Chain | – |
|---|
| Primary Drive Engine / Transmission | Belt | – |
|---|
| Drive line Modes | 1 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Final Drive | 4X2 | Chain 428 O-ring ✓ |
|---|
| Transmission Make | Duramatic | – |
|---|
| Transmission | Continuously Variable (CVT) | Automatic (CVT-belt) with reverse |
|---|
| Dimensions and Weight |
|---|
| Dry Weight (Kg / Lbs.) | 118 / 260 ✓ | 104.78 / 231 |
|---|
| Wheelbase (mm / in.) | 975.4 / 38.4 | 1001 / 39.4 ✓ |
|---|
| Ground Clearance (mm / in.) | 185.4 / 7.3 | – |
|---|
| Height (mm / in.) | 963 / 37.9 ✓ | 1019 / 40.1 |
|---|
| Width (mm / in.) | 876 / 34.5 | 871 / 34.3 ✓ |
|---|
| Length (mm / in.) | 1469 / 57.84 ✓ | 1481 / 58.3 |
|---|
| Suspension |
|---|
| Air Adjustable | No | – |
|---|
| Number of Rear Shock Absorbers | 1 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Rear Adjustable Rebound Damping | No | – |
|---|
| Rear Travel (mm / in.) | 74 / 2.9 ✓ | 51 / 2 |
|---|
| Swing Arm Skid Plate | No | – |
|---|
| Tires and Rims |
|---|
| Front Rim Diameter (in) | 8 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Seats |
|---|
| Seat Height (mm / in.) | – | 749 / 29.5 ✓ |
|---|
Clear all & start over
Pros & Cons
✓ Pros
- Lightest of the group — easier to manoeuvre
- Independent front suspension for better ride comfort
- CVT automatic transmission — easy to ride, no gear-changing
✗ Cons
- Smaller engine than the 2007 Dinli Diablo 150
- Drum brakes on front — less stopping power than disc
- 2WD only — less traction off-road than 4WD alternatives
✓ Pros
- Largest engine in this comparison (149 cccc)
- Independent front suspension for better ride comfort
- CVT automatic transmission — easy to ride, no gear-changing
- Lower seat height — more accessible for shorter riders
✗ Cons
- Heavier than the 2009 Arctic Cat 90 DVX SE
- Drum brakes on front — less stopping power than disc
Comparing 2009 Arctic Cat 90 DVX SE vs 2007 Dinli Diablo 150 — Common Questions
Which has the most powerful engine?
The 2007 Dinli Diablo 150 has the largest displacement at 149 cccc, making it the most powerful in this comparison. A larger engine generally means more torque for towing and off-road work.
Which quad is the lightest?
The 2009 Arctic Cat 90 DVX SE is the lightest at 118kg (dry weight). A lighter quad is easier to manoeuvre on trails and simpler to recover if stuck.
Which has the better suspension?
Independent front suspension (A-Arm or IFS) absorbs bumps better than solid-axle designs and improves handling on uneven terrain. Check the Suspension category in the full table above to compare front and rear travel for each model.
Which is the easiest to ride?
CVT automatic transmission is easiest for beginners — there is no gear-changing or clutch to manage. A lower seat height also makes a quad more accessible for shorter riders. Check the Transmission and Seat Height rows in the table above.
Advertisement