E.g. “Yamaha Kodiak”, “Can-Am Outlander”, “Kawasaki Brute Force”
Key Specs at a Glance
Engine
652 cc / 39.8
86cc / Unknown
Full Specifications
|  × Remove |  × Remove |
|---|
| Engine Spec |
|---|
| Engine Detail | 652 cc, 4-stroke, single, 4-valve DOHC ✓ | 86cc, Air Cooled, single cylinder, 4-Stroke |
|---|
| Colours |
|---|
| Metallic | No | – |
|---|
| Colors | Black | – |
|---|
| Lighting |
|---|
| Halogen Headlights | Standard | – |
|---|
| Headlights | Standard | – |
|---|
| Lighting | 1 headlamp dual bulb (30 W), 2 halogen auxiliary (35 W) w/ tail light/brake light ✓ | – |
|---|
| Instrumentation |
|---|
| Temperature Warning Type | Light | – |
|---|
| Tachometer | Standard | – |
|---|
| Instumentation | Indicator lamps: neutral, engine temperature. Tachometer | – |
|---|
| Seats |
|---|
| Seat Adjustable | No | – |
|---|
| Seat Type | One-Piece | – |
|---|
| Seat Material | Vinyl | – |
|---|
| Seat Location | Driver | – |
|---|
| Number Of Seats | 1 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Seat Height (mm / in.) | 857 / 33.8 | 648 / 25.5 ✓ |
|---|
| Fuel |
|---|
| Fuel Tank Capacity (l / gal.) | 12 / 3.2 ✓ | 6.06 / 1.6 |
|---|
| Tires and Rims |
|---|
| Rear Solid Axle | Yes | – |
|---|
| Rim Material | Aluminum | – |
|---|
| Rear Rim Diameter (in) | 9 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Rear Tire Width (in) | 10 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Rear Tire Diameter (in) | 20 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Tires Rear | 20 x 10 x 9 in. (508 x 254 x 229 mm) ✓ | 19 x 8-8 |
|---|
| Exterior - Safety and Design |
|---|
| Bash Plate (Front) | Yes | – |
|---|
| Bash Plate (Rear) | Yes | – |
|---|
| Body Material | Fiberglass | – |
|---|
| Brush Guard | No | – |
|---|
| Manufacturer and Warranty |
|---|
| Manufacturer Country | Canada | – |
|---|
| Performance |
|---|
| Torque rpm | 5500 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Torque (Ft Lbs.) | 42 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Torque (Nm) | 57 nm @ 5.500 RPM ✓ | – |
|---|
| Steering |
|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | – |
|---|
| Exterior - Safety and Design |
|---|
| Shock Cover | Yes | – |
|---|
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | No | – |
|---|
| Rear Fender | Standard | – |
|---|
| Rear Bumper | Standard | – |
|---|
| Radiator Guard | No | – |
|---|
| Tires and Rims |
|---|
| Front Rim Diameter (in) | 10 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Exterior - Safety and Design |
|---|
| Nerf Bars | Standard | – |
|---|
| Handlebar Pads | Standard | – |
|---|
| Hand Guards | Yes | – |
|---|
| Hand Grips | Standard | – |
|---|
| Full Length Skid Plate | Yes | – |
|---|
| Front Fender | Standard | – |
|---|
| Front Bumper | Standard | – |
|---|
| Frame | Steel | – |
|---|
| Folding Foot Pegs | No | – |
|---|
| Foot Peg Location | Driver | – |
|---|
| CV Boot Cover | No | – |
|---|
| Light Guard | No | – |
|---|
| Tires and Rims |
|---|
| Front Tire Width (in) | 7 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Front Tire Diameter (in) | 22 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Tires Front | 22 x 7 x 10 in. (559 x 178 x 254 mm) ✓ | 20 x 7-8 |
|---|
| Suspension |
|---|
| A-Arm Skid Plate (Front) | Yes | – |
|---|
| Front Suspension | Double A-arm; 12 in. travel (305 mm) ✓ | Independent suspension, 2.6 of travel |
|---|
| Brakes |
|---|
| Brakes Rear | 1 inboard hydraulic disc ✓ | Sealed drum |
|---|
| Brakes Front | 2 inboard hydraulic discs ✓ | Sealed drum |
|---|
| Engine Spec |
|---|
| Speed Governor | No | – |
|---|
| Ignition | Electric | CDI Electric with auxiliary coil |
|---|
| Fuel Type | Petrol | – |
|---|
| Carborator Count | 1 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Carburetor Size MM | 42 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Fuel System Brand | Mikuni | – |
|---|
| Suspension |
|---|
| Suspension - Front Travel (mm / in.) | 305 / 12 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Engine Spec |
|---|
| Fuel System | Mikuni BSR 42 ✓ | 15mm piston valve |
|---|
| Bore Stroke(mm) | 100 mm x 83 mm ✓ | 47 mm x 49.5 mm |
|---|
| Displacement To Weight CC | 1.32 | – |
|---|
| Engine Make | Rotax® | – |
|---|
| Engine Cylinders | single-cylinder | single cylinder |
|---|
| Engine Cooling | Liquid-cooled | Air-Cooled |
|---|
| Engine Type | 4-stroke | 4-Stroke |
|---|
| Total Valves | 4 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Valve Configuration | 4-valves ✓ | – |
|---|
| Engine Valves | DOHC | – |
|---|
| Engine Capacity (cc / Ci ) | 652 cc / 39.8 ✓ | 86cc / Unknown |
|---|
| Bore Stroke(in) | 3.94in. x 3.27 in. | – |
|---|
| Manufacturer and Warranty |
|---|
| Recommend Minimum Age | 16 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Suspension |
|---|
| Front Adjustable Fork Pre-Load | Yes | – |
|---|
| Suspension Rear | Swingarm; 11 in. travel (279 mm) ✓ | Swingarm with single shock, 2.6 of travel |
|---|
| Tires and Rims |
|---|
| Tire Make | Ohtsu® | – |
|---|
| Transmission (Gearbox) and Final Drive |
|---|
| Reverse | No | – |
|---|
| Number Of Speeds | 5 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Hi / Low Range | No | – |
|---|
| Primary Drive - Rear Wheels | Chain | – |
|---|
| Drive line Modes | 1 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Final Drive | Chain driven/solid axle | O-ring chain |
|---|
| Transmission | 5 speed - manual clutch ✓ | Automatic - 4-speed |
|---|
| Dimensions and Weight |
|---|
| Dry Weight (Kg / Lbs.) | 225 / 494 | 110 / 242.5 ✓ |
|---|
| Wheelbase (mm / in.) | 1244 / 49 | 986 / 38.799999999999997 ✓ |
|---|
| Suspension |
|---|
| Front Adjustable Rebound Damping | No | – |
|---|
| Dimensions and Weight |
|---|
| Ground Clearance (mm / in.) | 297 / 11.7 ✓ | 102 / 4 |
|---|
| Width (mm / in.) | 1219 / 48 | 894 / 35.2 ✓ |
|---|
| Length (mm / in.) | 1956 / 77 | 1488 / 58.6 ✓ |
|---|
| Suspension |
|---|
| Air Adjustable | No | – |
|---|
| Number of Rear Shock Absorbers | 1 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Rear Adjustable Shock Spring Pre-Load | Yes | – |
|---|
| Rear Adjustable Rebound Damping | Yes | – |
|---|
| Rear Travel (mm / in.) | 279 / 11 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Swing Arm Skid Plate | Yes | – |
|---|
| A-Arm Skid Plate (Rear) | No | – |
|---|
| Suspension Rear - Material | Steel | – |
|---|
| Dimensions and Weight |
|---|
| Height (mm / in.) | 1194 / 47 | 917 / 36.1 ✓ |
|---|
| Manufacturer and Warranty |
|---|
| Parent Company | Can-Am™ | – |
|---|
Clear all & start over
Pros & Cons
✓ Pros
- Largest engine in this comparison (652 cccc)
- Best ground clearance — handles rough terrain well
- Independent front suspension for better ride comfort
- Disc brakes front and rear — strong stopping power
✗ Cons
- Heavier than the 1999 Honda TR90
✓ Pros
- Lightest of the group — easier to manoeuvre
- Independent front suspension for better ride comfort
- Lower seat height — more accessible for shorter riders
✗ Cons
- Smaller engine than the 2007 Can-Am DS 650 X
Comparing 2007 Can-Am DS 650 X vs 1999 Honda TR90 — Common Questions
Which has the most powerful engine?
The 2007 Can-Am DS 650 X has the largest displacement at 652 cccc, making it the most powerful in this comparison. A larger engine generally means more torque for towing and off-road work.
Which quad is the lightest?
The 1999 Honda TR90 is the lightest at 110kg (dry weight). A lighter quad is easier to manoeuvre on trails and simpler to recover if stuck.
Which has the better suspension?
Independent front suspension (A-Arm or IFS) absorbs bumps better than solid-axle designs and improves handling on uneven terrain. Check the Suspension category in the full table above to compare front and rear travel for each model.
Which is the easiest to ride?
CVT automatic transmission is easiest for beginners — there is no gear-changing or clutch to manage. A lower seat height also makes a quad more accessible for shorter riders. Check the Transmission and Seat Height rows in the table above.
Advertisement