E.g. “Yamaha Kodiak”, “Can-Am Outlander”, “Kawasaki Brute Force”
2 of 3 selected:
Arctic Cat 400 4X4×
Kazuma Falcon 110×
Key Specs at a Glance
Engine
371cc / Unknown
107cc / Unknown
Full Specifications
| × Remove | × Remove |
|---|
| Engine Spec |
|---|
| Engine Detail | 371cc, liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, 4-valve, overhead cam with automatic compression release ✓ | 4-stroke, 1-cylinder |
|---|
| Seats |
|---|
| Seat Height (mm / in.) | – | 787 / 31 ✓ |
|---|
| Transmission (Gearbox) and Final Drive |
|---|
| Final Drive | – | Chain 2x4 ✓ |
|---|
| Engine Spec |
|---|
| Ignition | – | 12V, CDI ✓ |
|---|
| Towing |
|---|
| Towing Capacity (Kg / Lbs.) | 476 / 1050 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Racks and Payload |
|---|
| Rack Capacity Rear (Kg / Lbs.) | 91 / 200 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Rack Capacity Front (Kg / Lbs.) | 45 / 100 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Fuel |
|---|
| Fuel Tank Capacity (l / gal.) | 16 / 4.25 ✓ | 5 / 1.2 |
|---|
| Tires and Rims |
|---|
| Tires Rear | 25 x 10-12, (4psi) ✓ | 19 x 10 x 8 |
|---|
| Tires Front | 25 x 8-12, (4.5 psi) ✓ | 19 x 7 x 8 |
|---|
| Dimensions and Weight |
|---|
| Dry Weight (Kg / Lbs.) | 265 / 585 | 128 / 282 ✓ |
|---|
| Wheelbase (mm / in.) | 1270 / 50.0 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Performance |
|---|
| Power Output(hp in Kw) | – | 6.973 hp (5.2 kW) @ 7,100 rpm |
|---|
| Dimensions and Weight |
|---|
| Ground Clearance (mm / in.) | 234 / 9.2 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Width (mm / in.) | 1143 / 45.0 | 838 / 33 ✓ |
|---|
| Length (mm / in.) | 2019 / 79.5 | 1473 / 58 ✓ |
|---|
| Suspension |
|---|
| Suspension Rear | Semi-independent, 7.2" (18.3) of travel | Mono shock |
|---|
| Front Suspension | Independent double A-arm, 7.2" (18.3) of travel | Shocks, single A-arm |
|---|
| Brakes |
|---|
| Brakes Rear | Hydraulic disc, single-lever actuated | Drum |
|---|
| Brakes Front | Hydraulic disc, single-lever actuated, with parking brake. Foot operated mechanical rear brake, | Drum |
|---|
| Engine Spec |
|---|
| Engine Cylinders | single-cylinder | single-cylinder |
|---|
| Engine Cooling | liquid-cooled | Air / Oil-Cooled |
|---|
| Engine Type | 4-stroke | 4-stroke |
|---|
| Engine Valves | 4-valve, overhead cam with automatic compression release ✓ | – |
|---|
| Engine Capacity (cc / Ci ) | 371cc / Unknown ✓ | 107cc / Unknown |
|---|
| Dimensions and Weight |
|---|
| Height (mm / in.) | 1143 / 45.0 | 864 / 34 ✓ |
|---|
| Performance |
|---|
| Torque (Nm) | – | 7.3 Nm @ 6,000 rpm |
|---|
Clear all & start over
Pros & Cons
✓ Pros
- Largest engine in this comparison (371cccc)
- Highest rated towing capacity (476kg)
- Best ground clearance — handles rough terrain well
- Independent front suspension for better ride comfort
✗ Cons
- Heavier than the 2007 Kazuma Falcon 110
✓ Pros
- Lightest of the group — easier to manoeuvre
- Independent front suspension for better ride comfort
- Lower seat height — more accessible for shorter riders
✗ Cons
- Smaller engine than the 2000 Arctic Cat 400 4X4
Comparing 2000 Arctic Cat 400 4X4 vs 2007 Kazuma Falcon 110 — Common Questions
Which has the most powerful engine?
The 2000 Arctic Cat 400 4X4 has the largest displacement at 371cccc, making it the most powerful in this comparison. A larger engine generally means more torque for towing and off-road work.
Which quad is the lightest?
The 2007 Kazuma Falcon 110 is the lightest at 128kg (dry weight). A lighter quad is easier to manoeuvre on trails and simpler to recover if stuck.
Which is best for farm work and towing?
For heavy farm use the 2000 Arctic Cat 400 4X4 has the highest towing capacity at 476kg. For general farm duties any quad with 4WD and a towing rating above 400kg is suitable for light implements, spray rigs and game-reserve work.
Which has the better suspension?
Independent front suspension (A-Arm or IFS) absorbs bumps better than solid-axle designs and improves handling on uneven terrain. Check the Suspension category in the full table above to compare front and rear travel for each model.
Which is the easiest to ride?
CVT automatic transmission is easiest for beginners — there is no gear-changing or clutch to manage. A lower seat height also makes a quad more accessible for shorter riders. Check the Transmission and Seat Height rows in the table above.
Advertisement