E.g. “Yamaha Kodiak”, “Can-Am Outlander”, “Kawasaki Brute Force”
2 of 3 selected:
Dinli Dino 50×
Kazuma Falcon 250×
Key Specs at a Glance
Engine
49 cc / Unknown
249cc / Unknown
Full Specifications
| × Remove | × Remove |
|---|
| Engine Spec |
|---|
| Engine Detail | 2-stroke single, oil injection | 4-stroke ✓ |
|---|
| Suspension |
|---|
| Suspension Rear | – | Mono shock |
|---|
| Brakes |
|---|
| Brakes Front | – | Disc |
|---|
| Seats |
|---|
| Seat Height (mm / in.) | 531 / 20.9 ✓ | 787 / 31 |
|---|
| Racks and Payload |
|---|
| Rack Capacity Front (Kg / Lbs.) | Unknown / 100 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Fuel |
|---|
| Fuel Tank Capacity (l / gal.) | 2.54 / 0.67 | 5 / 1.2 ✓ |
|---|
| Tires and Rims |
|---|
| Tires Rear | Kenda 145/70-6 ✓ | 19 x 10 x 8 |
|---|
| Tires Front | Kenda 145/70-6 ✓ | 19 x 7 x 8 |
|---|
| Transmission (Gearbox) and Final Drive |
|---|
| Final Drive | Chain 428 O-ring ✓ | Chain 4x4 |
|---|
| Transmission | Automatic (CVT-belt) | – |
|---|
| Dimensions and Weight |
|---|
| Dry Weight (Kg / Lbs.) | 73.94 / 163 | 259 / 572 ✓ |
|---|
| Wheelbase (mm / in.) | 851 / 33.5 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Height (mm / in.) | 671 / 26.4 ✓ | 1016 / 40 |
|---|
| Width (mm / in.) | 729 / 28.7 ✓ | 991 / 39 |
|---|
| Length (mm / in.) | 1209 / 47.6 ✓ | 1524 / 60 |
|---|
| Suspension |
|---|
| Front Suspension | Rocker-arm with hydraulic shocks with 2 in. travel ✓ | Dual A-arms with shocks |
|---|
| Brakes |
|---|
| Brakes Rear | Mechanical discs | Disc |
|---|
| Engine Spec |
|---|
| Ignition | Electric / kick | 12V, CDI ✓ |
|---|
| Compression Ratio | 7.2:1 | – |
|---|
| Bore Stroke(mm) | 40.0 mm x 39.2 mm | – |
|---|
| Engine Cylinders | single-cylinder | single-cylinder |
|---|
| Engine Cooling | Air-cooled | Water |
|---|
| Engine Type | 2-stroke | 4-stroke ✓ |
|---|
| Engine Capacity (cc / Ci ) | 49 cc / Unknown | 249cc / Unknown ✓ |
|---|
| Performance |
|---|
| Power Output(hp in Kw) | – | 19.85 hp (14.8 kW) @ 8,500 rpm |
|---|
| Torque (Nm) | – | 17 Nm @ 6,500 rpm ✓ |
|---|
Clear all & start over
Pros & Cons
✓ Pros
- CVT automatic transmission — easy to ride, no gear-changing
- Lower seat height — more accessible for shorter riders
✗ Cons
- Smaller engine than the 2007 Kazuma Falcon 250
- Heavier than the 2007 Kazuma Falcon 250
✓ Pros
- Largest engine in this comparison (249cccc)
- Lightest of the group — easier to manoeuvre
- Independent front suspension for better ride comfort
- Disc brakes front and rear — strong stopping power
✗ Cons
- No significant weaknesses identified from available data
Comparing 2007 Dinli Dino 50 vs 2007 Kazuma Falcon 250 — Common Questions
Which has the most powerful engine?
The 2007 Kazuma Falcon 250 has the largest displacement at 249cccc, making it the most powerful in this comparison. A larger engine generally means more torque for towing and off-road work.
Which quad is the lightest?
The 2007 Kazuma Falcon 250 is the lightest at 259kg (dry weight). A lighter quad is easier to manoeuvre on trails and simpler to recover if stuck.
Which has the better suspension?
Independent front suspension (A-Arm or IFS) absorbs bumps better than solid-axle designs and improves handling on uneven terrain. Check the Suspension category in the full table above to compare front and rear travel for each model.
Which is the easiest to ride?
CVT automatic transmission is easiest for beginners — there is no gear-changing or clutch to manage. A lower seat height also makes a quad more accessible for shorter riders. Check the Transmission and Seat Height rows in the table above.
Advertisement