E.g. “Yamaha Kodiak”, “Can-Am Outlander”, “Kawasaki Brute Force”
3 of 3 selected:
Dinli Dino 50×
Kazuma Falcon 250×
Suzuki Ozark 250×
Key Specs at a Glance
Engine
49 cc / Unknown
249cc / Unknown
246 / 15.01
Full Specifications
| × Remove | × Remove | × Remove |
|---|
| Engine Spec |
|---|
| Engine Detail | 2-stroke single, oil injection | 4-stroke ✓ | – |
|---|
| Lighting |
|---|
| Lighting | – | – | Halogen |
|---|
| Towing |
|---|
| Towing Capacity (Kg / Lbs.) | – | – | 330.2 / 728 |
|---|
| Seats |
|---|
| Seat Adjustable | – | – | No |
|---|
| Seat Type | – | – | One-Piece |
|---|
| Seat Material | – | – | Vinyl |
|---|
| Seat Location | – | – | Driver |
|---|
| Number Of Seats | – | – | 1 ✓ |
|---|
| Storage |
|---|
| Underseat Storage | – | – | Standard |
|---|
| Racks and Payload |
|---|
| Rear Rack | – | – | Standard |
|---|
| Front Rack | – | – | Standard |
|---|
| Tires and Rims |
|---|
| Rear Solid Axle | – | – | Yes |
|---|
| Rim Material | – | – | Steel |
|---|
| Rear Rim Diameter (in) | – | – | 9 ✓ |
|---|
| Rear Tire Width (in) | – | – | 10 ✓ |
|---|
| Rear Tire Diameter (in) | – | – | 22 ✓ |
|---|
| Front Rim Diameter (in) | – | – | 11 ✓ |
|---|
| Front Tire Width (in) | – | – | 7 ✓ |
|---|
| Front Tire Diameter (in) | – | – | 22 ✓ |
|---|
| Tire Make | – | – | Dunlop |
|---|
| Transmission (Gearbox) and Final Drive |
|---|
| Reverse | – | – | Yes |
|---|
| Number Of Speeds | – | – | 5 ✓ |
|---|
| Lighting |
|---|
| Headlights | – | – | Standard |
|---|
| Halogen Headlights | – | – | Standard |
|---|
| Colours |
|---|
| Metallic | – | – | No |
|---|
| Exterior - Safety and Design |
|---|
| Bash Plate (Front) | – | – | Yes |
|---|
| Manufacturer and Warranty |
|---|
| Manufacturer Country | – | – | Japan |
|---|
| Steering |
|---|
| Steering Type | – | – | Manual |
|---|
| Exterior - Safety and Design |
|---|
| Shock Cover | – | – | No |
|---|
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | – | – | No |
|---|
| Rear Fender Flairs | – | – | Standard |
|---|
| Rear Fender | – | – | Standard |
|---|
| Radiator Guard | – | – | Yes |
|---|
| Light Guard | – | – | No |
|---|
| Hand Guards | – | – | No |
|---|
| Hand Grips | – | – | Standard |
|---|
| Transmission (Gearbox) and Final Drive |
|---|
| Hi / Low Range | – | – | No |
|---|
| Exterior - Safety and Design |
|---|
| Full Length Skid Plate | – | – | Yes |
|---|
| Front Fender | – | – | Standard |
|---|
| Front Fender Flairs | – | – | Standard |
|---|
| Front Bumper | – | – | Standard |
|---|
| Frame | – | – | Steel |
|---|
| Folding Foot Pegs | – | – | No |
|---|
| Foot Peg Location | – | – | Driver |
|---|
| Floor Board Location | – | – | Driver |
|---|
| Brush Guard | – | – | Yes |
|---|
| Body Material | – | – | Plastic |
|---|
| Bash Plate (Rear) | – | – | No |
|---|
| Front Stabilizer Bar | – | – | No |
|---|
| Manufacturer and Warranty |
|---|
| Recommend Minimum Age | – | – | 16 ✓ |
|---|
| Transmission (Gearbox) and Final Drive |
|---|
| Primary Drive - Rear Wheels | – | – | Shaft |
|---|
| Dimensions and Weight |
|---|
| Wet Weight (Lbs. / Kg) | – | – | 428 / 194 ✓ |
|---|
| Seats |
|---|
| Seat Height (mm / in.) | 531 / 20.9 ✓ | 787 / 31 | 785 / 30.9 |
|---|
| Racks and Payload |
|---|
| Rack Capacity Front (Kg / Lbs.) | Unknown / 100 ✓ | – | – |
|---|
| Fuel |
|---|
| Fuel Tank Capacity (l / gal.) | 2.54 / 0.67 | 5 / 1.2 ✓ | 9.7 / 2.6 |
|---|
| Tires and Rims |
|---|
| Tires Rear | Kenda 145/70-6 ✓ | 19 x 10 x 8 | Dunlop AT 22 X 10-9 |
|---|
| Tires Front | Kenda 145/70-6 ✓ | 19 x 7 x 8 | Dunlop AT 22 X 7-11 |
|---|
| Transmission (Gearbox) and Final Drive |
|---|
| Final Drive | Chain 428 O-ring ✓ | Chain 4x4 | 4X2 |
|---|
| Transmission | Automatic (CVT-belt) | – | Manual / Automatic Clutch |
|---|
| Dimensions and Weight |
|---|
| Dry Weight (Kg / Lbs.) | 73.94 / 163 | 259 / 572 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Wheelbase (mm / in.) | 851 / 33.5 ✓ | – | 1140 / 44.9 |
|---|
| Height (mm / in.) | 671 / 26.4 ✓ | 1016 / 40 | 1069 / 42.1 |
|---|
| Width (mm / in.) | 729 / 28.7 ✓ | 991 / 39 | 1044 / 41.1 |
|---|
| Length (mm / in.) | 1209 / 47.6 ✓ | 1524 / 60 | 1801 / 70.92 |
|---|
| Suspension |
|---|
| Front Suspension | Rocker-arm with hydraulic shocks with 2 in. travel ✓ | Dual A-arms with shocks | Independent Double A-Arm |
|---|
| Brakes |
|---|
| Brakes Rear | Mechanical discs | Disc | Drum |
|---|
| Engine Spec |
|---|
| Ignition | Electric / kick | 12V, CDI ✓ | Electric / Pull |
|---|
| Compression Ratio | 7.2:1 | – | 9.2:1 |
|---|
| Bore Stroke(mm) | 40.0 mm x 39.2 mm | – | 66mm x 72mm ✓ |
|---|
| Engine Cylinders | single-cylinder | single-cylinder | Single-Cylinder |
|---|
| Engine Cooling | Air-cooled | Water | Air |
|---|
| Engine Type | 2-stroke | 4-stroke | 4-Stroke |
|---|
| Engine Capacity (cc / Ci ) | 49 cc / Unknown | 249cc / Unknown ✓ | 246 / 15.01 |
|---|
| Brakes |
|---|
| Brakes Front | – | Disc | Dual Hydraulic Disc |
|---|
| Suspension |
|---|
| Suspension Rear | – | Mono shock | Swing Arm |
|---|
| Performance |
|---|
| Power Output(hp in Kw) | – | 19.85 hp (14.8 kW) @ 8,500 rpm | – |
|---|
| Torque (Nm) | – | 17 Nm @ 6,500 rpm ✓ | – |
|---|
| Dimensions and Weight |
|---|
| Ground Clearance (mm / in.) | – | – | 211 / 8.3 ✓ |
|---|
| Suspension |
|---|
| Air Adjustable | – | – | No |
|---|
| Number of Rear Shock Absorbers | – | – | 1 ✓ |
|---|
| Rear Adjustable Shock Spring Pre-Load | – | – | No |
|---|
| Rear Adjustable Rebound Damping | – | – | No |
|---|
| Rear Travel (mm / in.) | – | – | 140 / 5.5 ✓ |
|---|
| Swing Arm Skid Plate | – | – | No |
|---|
| A-Arm Skid Plate (Rear) | – | – | No |
|---|
| Suspension Rear - Material | – | – | Steel |
|---|
| Front Adjustable Rebound Damping | – | – | No |
|---|
| Transmission (Gearbox) and Final Drive |
|---|
| Drive line Modes | – | – | 1 ✓ |
|---|
| Suspension |
|---|
| Front Adjustable Fork Pre-Load | – | – | No |
|---|
| Brakes |
|---|
| Front Brake Diameter (mm / in.) | – | – | 160 / 6.3 ✓ |
|---|
| Engine Spec |
|---|
| Fuel Type | – | – | Petrol |
|---|
| Carborator Count | – | – | 1 ✓ |
|---|
| Carburetor Size MM | – | – | 29 ✓ |
|---|
| Fuel System Brand | – | – | Mikuni |
|---|
| Fuel System | – | – | Carburetor |
|---|
| Bore Stroke(in) | – | – | 2.6in. x 2.84in. |
|---|
| Total Valves | – | – | 2 ✓ |
|---|
| Valve Configuration | – | – | 2-valves ✓ |
|---|
| Engine Valves | – | – | SOHC |
|---|
| Suspension |
|---|
| Suspension - Front Travel (mm / in.) | – | – | 140 / 5.5 ✓ |
|---|
| Manufacturer and Warranty |
|---|
| Parent Company | – | – | Suzuki |
|---|
Clear all & start over
Pros & Cons
✓ Pros
- CVT automatic transmission — easy to ride, no gear-changing
- Lower seat height — more accessible for shorter riders
✗ Cons
- Smaller engine than the 2007 Kazuma Falcon 250
- Heavier than the 2007 Kazuma Falcon 250
✓ Pros
- Largest engine in this comparison (249cccc)
- Lightest of the group — easier to manoeuvre
- Independent front suspension for better ride comfort
- Disc brakes front and rear — strong stopping power
✗ Cons
- No significant weaknesses identified from available data
✓ Pros
- Best ground clearance — handles rough terrain well
- Independent front suspension for better ride comfort
- Manual gearbox — greater control in technical terrain
✗ Cons
- Smaller engine than the 2007 Kazuma Falcon 250
- 2WD only — less traction off-road than 4WD alternatives
Comparing 2007 Dinli Dino 50 vs 2007 Kazuma Falcon 250 vs 2012 Suzuki Ozark 250 — Common Questions
Which has the most powerful engine?
The 2007 Kazuma Falcon 250 has the largest displacement at 249cccc, making it the most powerful in this comparison. A larger engine generally means more torque for towing and off-road work.
Which quad is the lightest?
The 2007 Kazuma Falcon 250 is the lightest at 259kg (dry weight). A lighter quad is easier to manoeuvre on trails and simpler to recover if stuck.
Which has the better suspension?
Independent front suspension (A-Arm or IFS) absorbs bumps better than solid-axle designs and improves handling on uneven terrain. Check the Suspension category in the full table above to compare front and rear travel for each model.
Which is the easiest to ride?
CVT automatic transmission is easiest for beginners — there is no gear-changing or clutch to manage. A lower seat height also makes a quad more accessible for shorter riders. Check the Transmission and Seat Height rows in the table above.
Advertisement