E.g. “Yamaha Kodiak”, “Can-Am Outlander”, “Kawasaki Brute Force”
2 of 3 selected:
Kazuma Falcon 150×
Suzuki QuadSport 80 Automatic×
Key Specs at a Glance
Engine
149cc / Unknown
82cc / 5
Full Specifications
| × Remove | × Remove |
|---|
| Engine Spec |
|---|
| Engine Detail | 4-stroke, 7 kW @ 7,500 rpm | 82cc, forced-air-cooled, two-stroke, single cylinder ✓ |
|---|
| Seats |
|---|
| Seat Type | – | One-Piece |
|---|
| Seat Material | – | Vinyl |
|---|
| Seat Location | – | Driver |
|---|
| Number Of Seats | – | 1 ✓ |
|---|
| Tires and Rims |
|---|
| Rear Solid Axle | – | Yes |
|---|
| Rim Material | – | Steel |
|---|
| Rear Rim Width (in) | – | 7 ✓ |
|---|
| Rear Rim Diameter (in) | – | 8 ✓ |
|---|
| Seats |
|---|
| Seat Adjustable | – | No |
|---|
| Tires and Rims |
|---|
| Rear Tire Width (in) | – | 7 ✓ |
|---|
| Front Rim Width (in) | – | 7 ✓ |
|---|
| Front Rim Diameter (in) | – | 8 ✓ |
|---|
| Front Tire Width (in) | – | 7 ✓ |
|---|
| Front Tire Diameter (in) | – | 19 ✓ |
|---|
| Tire Make | – | Dunlop |
|---|
| Transmission (Gearbox) and Final Drive |
|---|
| Reverse | – | No |
|---|
| Hi / Low Range | – | No |
|---|
| Primary Drive - Rear Wheels | – | Chain |
|---|
| Tires and Rims |
|---|
| Rear Tire Diameter (in) | – | 19 ✓ |
|---|
| Instrumentation |
|---|
| Parental Controls | – | Standard |
|---|
| Colours |
|---|
| Colors | – | Yellow/Black, Red/Black |
|---|
| Comfort |
|---|
| Adjustable Throttle | – | Standard |
|---|
| Manufacturer and Warranty |
|---|
| Manufacturer Country | – | Japan |
|---|
| Steering |
|---|
| Steering Type | – | Manual |
|---|
| Exterior - Safety and Design |
|---|
| Snorkel Air Intake | – | Standard |
|---|
| Shock Cover | – | No |
|---|
| Rear Fender | – | Standard |
|---|
| Rear Bumper | – | Standard |
|---|
| Light Guard | – | No |
|---|
| Handlebar Pads | – | Standard |
|---|
| Hand Guards | – | No |
|---|
| Hand Grips | – | Standard |
|---|
| Front Fender | – | Standard |
|---|
| Front Bumper | – | Standard |
|---|
| Frame | – | Steel |
|---|
| Foot Peg Location | – | Driver |
|---|
| CV Boot Cover | – | No |
|---|
| Brush Guard | – | No |
|---|
| Body Material | – | Plastic |
|---|
| Bash Plate (Rear) | – | No |
|---|
| Bash Plate (Front) | – | Yes |
|---|
| Transmission (Gearbox) and Final Drive |
|---|
| Drive line Modes | – | 1 ✓ |
|---|
| Final Drive | – | #520 chain ✓ |
|---|
| Transmission | – | Variable-speed, automatic clutch |
|---|
| Dimensions and Weight |
|---|
| Wheelbase (mm / in.) | – | 939.8 / 37 |
|---|
| Engine Spec |
|---|
| Engine Valves | – | SOHC (Single overhead Cam) |
|---|
| Performance |
|---|
| Power Output(hp in Kw) | 7 kW @ 7,500 rpm ✓ | – |
|---|
| Seats |
|---|
| Seat Height (mm / in.) | 787 / 31 ✓ | 645.2 / 25.4 |
|---|
| Fuel |
|---|
| Fuel Tank Capacity (l / gal.) | 5 / 1.2 | 6 / 1.6 ✓ |
|---|
| Tires and Rims |
|---|
| Tires Rear | 19 x 7 x 8 | AT 19 x 7-8 |
|---|
| Tires Front | 19 x 7 x 8 | AT 19 x 7-8 |
|---|
| Dimensions and Weight |
|---|
| Dry Weight (Kg / Lbs.) | 181 / 400 ✓ | 99.8 / 220 |
|---|
| Height (mm / in.) | 965 / 38 | 870 / 34.3 ✓ |
|---|
| Width (mm / in.) | 914 / 36 | 805 / 31.7 ✓ |
|---|
| Length (mm / in.) | 1499 / 59 | 1420 / 55.9 ✓ |
|---|
| Suspension |
|---|
| Suspension Rear | Swing arm, adjustable shocks | Unit swing suspension, oil-damped |
|---|
| Front Suspension | Independent with dual A-arms, adjustable shocks | Independent, single A-arm, oil-damped |
|---|
| Brakes |
|---|
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Single mechanical drum |
|---|
| Brakes Front | Disc | Dual mechanical drum |
|---|
| Engine Spec |
|---|
| Ignition | 12V CDI ✓ | CDI (Electic) |
|---|
| Engine Cylinders | single-cylinder | single-cylinder |
|---|
| Engine Cooling | Air / Oil-Cooled | forced-air-cooled |
|---|
| Engine Type | 4-stroke ✓ | two-stroke |
|---|
| Engine Capacity (cc / Ci ) | 149cc / Unknown ✓ | 82cc / 5 |
|---|
| Displacement To Weight CC | – | 0.37 |
|---|
| Manufacturer and Warranty |
|---|
| Recommend Minimum Age | – | 12 ✓ |
|---|
| Engine Spec |
|---|
| Bore Stroke(mm) | – | 50.0mm x 42.0mm |
|---|
| Compression Ratio | – | 7.4:1 |
|---|
| Dimensions and Weight |
|---|
| Ground Clearance (mm / in.) | – | 109.2 / 4.3 |
|---|
| Suspension |
|---|
| Number of Rear Shock Absorbers | – | 1 ✓ |
|---|
| Rear Adjustable Shock Spring Pre-Load | – | No |
|---|
| Rear Adjustable Rebound Damping | – | No |
|---|
| Swing Arm Skid Plate | – | No |
|---|
| A-Arm Skid Plate (Rear) | – | No |
|---|
| Suspension Rear - Material | – | Steel |
|---|
| Front Adjustable Rebound Damping | – | No |
|---|
| Front Adjustable Fork Pre-Load | – | No |
|---|
| A-Arm Skid Plate (Front) | – | No |
|---|
| Brakes |
|---|
| Linked Brake System Front to Rear | – | Standard |
|---|
| Rear Brake Diameter (mm / in.) | – | 130 / 5.1 ✓ |
|---|
| Front Brake Diameter (mm / in.) | – | 80 / 3.2 ✓ |
|---|
| Engine Spec |
|---|
| Lubrication | – | Oil injection |
|---|
| Fuel Type | – | Petrol / 2 Stroke Oil Auto Mix ✓ |
|---|
| Carborator Count | – | 1 ✓ |
|---|
| Carburetor Size MM | – | 16 ✓ |
|---|
| Fuel System Brand | – | Mikuni |
|---|
| Fuel System | – | Mikuni VM16SH ✓ |
|---|
| Bore Stroke(in) | – | 1.97in. x 1.65 in. |
|---|
| Manufacturer and Warranty |
|---|
| Parent Company | – | Suzuki |
|---|
Clear all & start over
Pros & Cons
✓ Pros
- Largest engine in this comparison (149cccc)
- Lightest of the group — easier to manoeuvre
- Independent front suspension for better ride comfort
- Disc brakes front and rear — strong stopping power
✗ Cons
- No significant weaknesses identified from available data
✓ Pros
- Independent front suspension for better ride comfort
✗ Cons
- Smaller engine than the 2006 Kazuma Falcon 150
- Heavier than the 2006 Kazuma Falcon 150
Comparing 2006 Kazuma Falcon 150 vs 2004 Suzuki QuadSport 80 Automatic — Common Questions
Which has the most powerful engine?
The 2006 Kazuma Falcon 150 has the largest displacement at 149cccc, making it the most powerful in this comparison. A larger engine generally means more torque for towing and off-road work.
Which quad is the lightest?
The 2006 Kazuma Falcon 150 is the lightest at 181kg (dry weight). A lighter quad is easier to manoeuvre on trails and simpler to recover if stuck.
Which has the better suspension?
Independent front suspension (A-Arm or IFS) absorbs bumps better than solid-axle designs and improves handling on uneven terrain. Check the Suspension category in the full table above to compare front and rear travel for each model.
Which is the easiest to ride?
CVT automatic transmission is easiest for beginners — there is no gear-changing or clutch to manage. A lower seat height also makes a quad more accessible for shorter riders. Check the Transmission and Seat Height rows in the table above.
Advertisement