E.g. “Yamaha Kodiak”, “Can-Am Outlander”, “Kawasaki Brute Force”
2 of 3 selected:
Suzuki KingQuad 400 ASi Camo×
Kawasaki Lakota 300×
Key Specs at a Glance
Engine
376 / 22.94
290cc / Unknown
Full Specifications
| × Remove | × Remove |
|---|
| Engine Spec |
|---|
| Engine Capacity (cc / Ci ) | 376 / 22.94 ✓ | 290cc / Unknown |
|---|
| Exterior - Safety and Design |
|---|
| Bash Plate (Front) | Yes | – |
|---|
| Colours |
|---|
| Metallic | No | – |
|---|
| Lighting |
|---|
| Halogen Headlights | Standard | – |
|---|
| Headlights | Standard | – |
|---|
| Lighting | Halogen | – |
|---|
| Instrumentation |
|---|
| Temperature Warning Type | Light | – |
|---|
| Speedometer | Standard | – |
|---|
| Hour Meter | Standard | – |
|---|
| Fuel Level Warning Type | Gauge | – |
|---|
| Clock | Standard | – |
|---|
| Exterior - Safety and Design |
|---|
| Bash Plate (Rear) | No | – |
|---|
| Instrumentation |
|---|
| Trip Odometer | Standard | – |
|---|
| Seats |
|---|
| Seat Adjustable | No | – |
|---|
| Seat Type | One-Piece | – |
|---|
| Seat Material | Vinyl | – |
|---|
| Seat Location | Driver | – |
|---|
| Number Of Seats | 1 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Seat Height (mm / in.) | 841 / 33.1 | 777 / 30.6 ✓ |
|---|
| Storage |
|---|
| Underseat Storage | Standard | – |
|---|
| Racks and Payload |
|---|
| Rear Rack | Standard | – |
|---|
| Front Rack | Standard | – |
|---|
| Fuel |
|---|
| Fuel Tank Capacity (l / gal.) | 16 / 4.2 ✓ | 8.33 / 2.2 |
|---|
| Instrumentation |
|---|
| Digital Instrumentation | Standard | – |
|---|
| Exterior - Safety and Design |
|---|
| Body Material | Plastic | – |
|---|
| Brush Guard | Yes | – |
|---|
| CV Boot Cover | No | – |
|---|
| Racks and Payload |
|---|
| Rack Capacity Front (Kg / Lbs.) | – | 20 / 44 ✓ |
|---|
| Dimensions and Weight |
|---|
| Dry Weight (Kg / Lbs.) | – | 208 / 459.6 ✓ |
|---|
| Engine Spec |
|---|
| Engine Detail | – | 290cc, Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC single cylinder ✓ |
|---|
| Manufacturer and Warranty |
|---|
| Warranty Info | 12 Limited ✓ | – |
|---|
| Parent Company | Suzuki | – |
|---|
| Recommend Minimum Age | 16 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Manufacturer Country | Japan | – |
|---|
| Steering |
|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | – |
|---|
| Exterior - Safety and Design |
|---|
| Shock Cover | No | – |
|---|
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | No | – |
|---|
| Rear Fender Flairs | Standard | – |
|---|
| Rear Fender | Standard | – |
|---|
| Radiator Guard | Yes | – |
|---|
| Power Outlet | Standard | – |
|---|
| Light Guard | No | – |
|---|
| Hand Grips | Standard | – |
|---|
| Full Length Skid Plate | Yes | – |
|---|
| Front Stabilizer Bar | No | – |
|---|
| Front Fender | Standard | – |
|---|
| Front Fender Flairs | Standard | – |
|---|
| Front Bumper | Standard | – |
|---|
| Frame | Steel | – |
|---|
| Floor Board Location | Driver | – |
|---|
| Tires and Rims |
|---|
| Rear Solid Axle | Yes | – |
|---|
| Rim Material | Steel | – |
|---|
| Rear Rim Diameter (in) | 12 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Rear Tire Width (in) | 10 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Suspension |
|---|
| Rear Travel (mm / in.) | 170 / 6.7 ✓ | – |
|---|
| A-Arm Skid Plate (Rear) | No | – |
|---|
| Suspension Rear | Swing Arm | Swingarm with 1 shock, 8.5 of travel ✓ |
|---|
| Front Adjustable Rebound Damping | No | – |
|---|
| Front Adjustable Fork Pre-Load | No | – |
|---|
| Suspension - Front Travel (mm / in.) | 170 / 6.7 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Front Suspension | Independent Double A-Arm | Independent double wishbone, with 2 shocks, 6.9 of travel ✓ |
|---|
| Brakes |
|---|
| Brakes Rear | Drum | Disc |
|---|
| Front Brake Diameter (mm / in.) | 190 / 7.5 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Brakes Front | Dual Hydraulic Disc | Dual Disc |
|---|
| Engine Spec |
|---|
| Ignition | Electric | Electronic, maintenance free Electric with recoil backup |
|---|
| Fuel Type | Petrol | – |
|---|
| Fuel System | Fuel Injected | Kleihin CVK32 ✓ |
|---|
| Compression Ratio | 9:1 ✓ | 8.6:1 |
|---|
| Bore Stroke(in) | 3.23in. x 2.81in. | – |
|---|
| Bore Stroke(mm) | 82mm x 71.2mm ✓ | 76 mm x 64 mm |
|---|
| Engine Braking | Engine Braking System | – |
|---|
| Engine Cylinders | Single-Cylinder | single-cylinder |
|---|
| Engine Cooling | Air / Oil | Air-Cooled |
|---|
| Engine Type | 4-Stroke | 4-stroke |
|---|
| Total Valves | 4 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Valve Configuration | 4-valves ✓ | – |
|---|
| Engine Valves | SOHC | SOHC |
|---|
| Suspension |
|---|
| Rear Adjustable Rebound Damping | No | – |
|---|
| Racks and Payload |
|---|
| Rack Capacity Rear (Kg / Lbs.) | – | 29.9 / 66 |
|---|
| Suspension |
|---|
| Rear Adjustable Shock Spring Pre-Load | No | – |
|---|
| Air Adjustable | No | – |
|---|
| Tires and Rims |
|---|
| Rear Tire Diameter (in) | 25 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Tires Rear | Carlisle AT 25 X 10-12 ✓ | 22 x 11-10 tubeless |
|---|
| Front Rim Diameter (in) | 12 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Front Tire Width (in) | 8 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Front Tire Diameter (in) | 25 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Tires Front | Carlisle AT 25 X 8-12 ✓ | 22 x 8-10 tubeless |
|---|
| Tube / Tubeless | Tubeless | – |
|---|
| Tire Make | Carlisle | – |
|---|
| Transmission (Gearbox) and Final Drive |
|---|
| Reverse | Yes | – |
|---|
| Hi / Low Range | Yes | – |
|---|
| Limited Slip Diff Location | Front | – |
|---|
| Primary Drive - Front Wheels | Shaft | – |
|---|
| Primary Drive Engine / Transmission | Belt | – |
|---|
| Drive line Modes | 2 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Final Drive | Selectable 4X2 / 4X4 ✓ | Chain |
|---|
| Transmission Make | Quadmatic | – |
|---|
| Transmission | Continuously Variable (CVT) | Automatic centrifugal and automatic wet multi-disc - 5-speed plus reverse ✓ |
|---|
| Dimensions and Weight |
|---|
| Wet Weight (Lbs. / Kg) | 628 / 285 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Wheelbase (mm / in.) | 1270 / 50 | 1140 / 44.9 ✓ |
|---|
| Ground Clearance (mm / in.) | 249 / 9.8 ✓ | 196 / 7.7 |
|---|
| Height (mm / in.) | 1219 / 48 | 0 / 0 ✓ |
|---|
| Width (mm / in.) | 1146 / 45.1 | 1080 / 42.5 ✓ |
|---|
| Length (mm / in.) | 2060 / 81.12 | 1745 / 68.7 ✓ |
|---|
| Suspension |
|---|
| Number of Rear Shock Absorbers | 2 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Towing |
|---|
| Towing Capacity (Kg / Lbs.) | – | 294.8 / 650 |
|---|
Clear all & start over
Pros & Cons
✓ Pros
- Largest engine in this comparison (376cc)
- Best ground clearance — handles rough terrain well
- Independent front suspension for better ride comfort
- CVT automatic transmission — easy to ride, no gear-changing
✗ Cons
- No significant weaknesses identified from available data
✓ Pros
- Lightest of the group — easier to manoeuvre
- Independent front suspension for better ride comfort
- Disc brakes front and rear — strong stopping power
- Lower seat height — more accessible for shorter riders
✗ Cons
- Smaller engine than the 2020 Suzuki KingQuad 400 ASi Camo
Comparing 2020 Suzuki KingQuad 400 ASi Camo vs 1999 Kawasaki Lakota 300 — Common Questions
Which has the most powerful engine?
The 2020 Suzuki KingQuad 400 ASi Camo has the largest displacement at 376cc, making it the most powerful in this comparison. A larger engine generally means more torque for towing and off-road work.
Which quad is the lightest?
The 1999 Kawasaki Lakota 300 is the lightest at 208kg (dry weight). A lighter quad is easier to manoeuvre on trails and simpler to recover if stuck.
Which has the better suspension?
Independent front suspension (A-Arm or IFS) absorbs bumps better than solid-axle designs and improves handling on uneven terrain. Check the Suspension category in the full table above to compare front and rear travel for each model.
Which is the easiest to ride?
CVT automatic transmission is easiest for beginners — there is no gear-changing or clutch to manage. A lower seat height also makes a quad more accessible for shorter riders. Check the Transmission and Seat Height rows in the table above.
Advertisement